gety9
January 16, 2022, 10:29pm
1
Guys hi
First of all thank you for restic! It’s amazing
And question: I’d like my files to be backed up to 3 sources, what’s the best way to achieve it?
—Do i 1) Init 3 different repos?
restic -r E:/localBups init
restic -r rclone:Gdrive:GBups init
restic -r rclone:Dropbox:DBups init
and then back up each
restic -r E:/localBups backup C:/documents
restic -r rclone:Gdrive:GBups backup C:/documents
restic -r rclone:DropBox:DBups backup C:/documents
—Or do i 2) Init 1 repo and sync it to gdrive / dropbox?
restic -r E:/localBups init
rclone sync E:/localBups Gdrive:GBups
rclone sync E:/localBups Dropbox:DBups
rawtaz
January 16, 2022, 10:51pm
2
I do #1 , but if you don’t have or want to spend the resources for it, go for #2 .
doscott
January 16, 2022, 10:57pm
3
In the first case any undetected errors (highly unlikely) will have to occur in all three repo’s before you are totally out of luck.
In the second case, any undetected errors (highly unlikely) to the local backup will be propagated to the remote backups, so you could be totally out of luck.
The second case can be faster when there are substantial changes, but the first case should be faster (because of the cache) in most cases.
Personally I am using your first case.
3 Likes
gety9
January 17, 2022, 3:46pm
4
Thank you for clear explanation of cons/pros.
1 Like
doscott:
In the first case any undetected errors (highly unlikely) will have to occur in all three repo’s before you are totally out of luck.
In the second case, any undetected errors (highly unlikely) to the local backup will be propagated to the remote backups, so you could be totally out of luck.
The second case can be faster when there are substantial changes, but the first case should be faster (because of the cache) in most cases.
Personally I am using your first case.
thanks for the awesome information.