Restic Disk Usage Has Me Tearing My Hair Out

No, because the data is not the same when stored on server 2 as it is/was when stored on server 1.

  • On server 1, the ZFS sees compressible data and thereby successfully compresses it from 4.8 TB to 2.2 TB on disk.

  • On server 2, the ZFS there sees less compressible data (restic’s encrypted binary blobs et al), and thereby is not as successful in compressing it (but manages to do so from 4.8 TB to 4.4 TB on disk) - or it’s restic that compresses the data from 4.8 TB to 4.4 TB.

At least that’s my theory, but whether it’s correct or not depends on the answers to Michael’s questions :slight_smile:

1 Like